Obesity can impair ultrasound imaging quality of abdominal anatomy, specifically the liver and kidneys, and the application of high-performance probes can increase anatomic depiction in patients living with obesity. These are the findings of a study conducted at the University of Leipzig Medical Center and supported by the Helmholtz Institute for Metabolism, Obesity and Vascular Research (HI-MAG) showing obesity affects the quality of ultrasound scans of the liver and kidneys. It also shows that the use of high-performance ultrasound probes can improve the anatomical depiction in these patients.
Ultrasound of the abdominal organs is a central diagnostic tool and is recommended as the first-line approach for many medical conditions. Compared with other imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound is readily available, avoids unnecessary radiation exposure and can be used in almost every case. However, the accuracy of this method is usually limited in obese individuals because the imaging quality of anatomical structures is impaired. To date, the degree of obesity at which ultrasound diagnostics are no longer sufficiently precise has not been sufficiently researched.
"The results showed that as the body mass index of the patients increased, the image quality of the ultrasound decreased. It also became clear that modern probes with matrix technology improve the quality of ultrasound imaging," explained Professor Thomas Karlas, head of the study and corresponding author of the paper, 'The application of high-performance ultrasound probes increases anatomic depiction in obese patients, published in Scientific Reports.
The matrix probes have an improved transmitting and receiving performance and therefore achieve greater penetration depth into the tissue. This allows for better diagnostic accuracy in high-risk patients. The performance of matrix probes in obese individuals has not yet been scientifically validated.
The current data show that these relatively expensive special probes for ultrasound equipment can provide significant added value. The 40 participants in the study underwent a highly standardised ultrasound examination of the abdomen with three different probes: a standard probe and two high-performance probes. The liver and right kidney were examined in people with varying degrees of obesity, and the quality of the ultrasound imaging was scored.
"Particularly in centres that specialise in the care of obese patients, for example, in diabetology, nutritional medicine or bariatric surgery, ultrasound equipment with matrix probes should be available for abdominal examinations," added Karlas, senior physician and head of the Interdisciplinary Central Ultrasound Unit in the Department of Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Pneumology at the University. "Even if matrix probes improve the quality of ultrasound imaging in obese patients, the quality is often not as good as in lean patients. Obesity therefore remains a challenge - both as a cause of secondary diseases such as metabolic liver disease - and as a limitation for widely used diagnostic methods."
A follow-up project will investigate whether specialised ultrasound applications (e.g., determination of liver fat content and liver stiffness) work better with the high-performance probes than with conventional methods.
To access this paper, please click here
Comments